Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214373›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

Exploration of the Extraperitoneal Approach for Single-Level Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Imaging, Anatomical and Clinical Research.

Kexin Qin, Heshun Tian, Kunsheng Zhang, Kaihui Zhang, Lilong Du, Bingshan Yan, Zhenxin Huo, Mingzhi Deng, Baoshan Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kexin Qin *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Heshun Tian *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Kunsheng Zhang *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Kaihui Zhang *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Lilong Du *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Bingshan Yan *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Zhenxin Huo *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Mingzhi Deng *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.
Baoshan Xu *406. No, Jiefangnan Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300211 China Department of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To explore extraperitoneal approach as an optimal option for reducing peritoneal disruption at a single-level disc in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Methods: First, abdominal axial CT images obtained from 111 patients were observed to evaluate the distribution of extraperitoneal fat at L2-S1 and measure the lateral distances between the midline and the lateral borders of the rectus and the extraperitoneal fat for each disc level. Second, eight embalmed corpses were dissected along the lateral border of the rectus to expose the peritoneum, which was then separated laterally and medially to evaluate the distribution of fat and peritoneum adhesion. Finally, a total of 58 patients were selected for ALIF. For L2-L4 discs and L4-S1, the pararectus approach and the paramedian approach were utilized, respectively. Results: Extraperitoneal fat was observed behind the rectus at the L5-S1 and the lateral distance between the fat and midline and the lateral border of the rectus gradually decreased on both sides of L2-5. On the cranial side of the arcuate line, it was easier to separate the peritoneum outward along the lateral edge of the rectus. When bluntly dissected medially, the peritoneum was closely adhered to abdominal wall. No complications such as peritoneal damage, retroperitoneal hematoma and neurological complications occurred in 58 patients undergoing the aforementioned surgical methods. Conclusions: For L4-S1, the paramedian approach is the optimal technique to expose the disc, whereas the pararectus approach is the feasible surgical method at L2-4.

Indexed as

ALIFArcuate lineExtraperitoneal fatParamedian approachPararectus approachRectus abdominis

Identifiers

PMID37214373
PMCPMC10192491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.