ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Are Two- and Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Scan Measurements of Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance Equivalent? A Comparative Study.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate planning for patellar instability correction is important in obtaining good post-operative outcome. The main challenge in the current two-dimensional (2-D) computed tomographic (CT) scans method is the difficulty in choosing reliable bony landmarks. This study aimed to compare the reliabilities between the 2-D and three-dimensional (3-D) methods of measuring tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance. We hypothesize that the proposed 3-D method will result in measurements with narrower error margin, providing higher reliability and accuracy. Materials and Methods: We traced CT scans of 106 knees with no patellofemoral pathology from 59 subjects from the database system and converted all 2-D images into 3-D models to determine the values for each parameter. We compared the intra- and interobserver reliability of each method using intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman method. Results: The values of TT-TG measured by 2-D and 3-D methods were 16.1 ± 4.6 mm and 16.2 ± 4.2 mm, respectively. The ICC values of both methods were comparable (95% limits of agreement between the same observer: - 3.3 to 3.8 mm versus - 2.4 to 2.7 mm and different observers: - 4.3 to 4.9 mm versus - 3.9 to 2.7 mm), with 3-D method results in narrower limits of agreement. Conclusion: TT-TG measurement is reliable using the 2-D method without using advanced radiographic software. The 3-D method of measuring TT-TG provides measurement with narrower variation when compared with the 2-D method. However, both TT-TG distances' measurement methods in the current study were comparable as the variations are not significant. Graphical Abstract:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.