Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214319›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of bioprinting2023

Bioprinting of exosomes: Prospects and challenges for clinical applications.

Shivaram Selvam, Ben Thomas Midhun, Tuhin Bhowmick, Arun Chandru

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of bioprinting, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shivaram SelvamPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore Bioinnovation Centre, Electronic City Phase Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ben Thomas MidhunPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore Bioinnovation Centre, Electronic City Phase Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Tuhin BhowmickPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore Bioinnovation Centre, Electronic City Phase Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Arun ChandruPandorum Technologies Private Limited, Bangalore Bioinnovation Centre, Electronic City Phase Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Bangalore Diabetes Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

453Three-dimensional bioprinting (3DBP) is an additive manufacturing technique that has emerged as a promising strategy for the fabrication of scaffolds, which can successfully recapitulate the architectural, biochemical, and physical cues of target tissues. More importantly, 3DBP offers fine spatiotemporal control and high submicron scale resolution, which can be leveraged for the incorporation and directional gradient release of single or multiple biomimetic cues, including cell-derived exosomes (EXOs). EXOs are extracellular vesicles that originate from the endosomal compartment of various cell types, with sizes ranging from 30 to120 nm. They act as cell mediators and contain discrete cell constituents, including growth factors, cytokines, lipid moieties, nucleic acids, metabolites, and cell surface markers, depending on the cell type. Essentially, owing to their therapeutic potential, EXOs derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been recently investigated in several clinical trials for the treatment of various conditions, including cancer, diabetes, dry eyes, periodontitis, and acute ischemic stroke. The 3DBP strategy of EXOs is especially useful in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications, as tissues can be biofabricated to closely mimic the complex microarchitecture and developmental profiles of native heterogeneous tissues for restoring biological functions. Moreover, EXOs can be manipulated to carry exogenous cargo such as genes or proteins of therapeutic interest, confer multifunctional attributes, and further enhance their tissue regenerative potential. However, significant challenges, including the selection of appropriate bioink, pattern resolution, engineering-defined exosomal gradient, spatial presentation and modulation of EXO release kinetics, as well as EXO stability and storage conditions, must be addressed for the successful translation of therapeutic grade EXOs to clinical settings. In this review, we highlight the recent advances and offer future perspectives on the bioprinting of EXOs as regenerative biotherapeutics for the fabrication of complex heterogeneous tissues that are suitable for clinical transplantation.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingBioinkExosomesTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID37214319
PMCPMC10195394
OpenAlexW4323044767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.