Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214261›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental studies and sciences2023

Green roles at home: exploring the impact of household social dynamic processes on consumption at the food-energy-water (FEW) nexus.

Holly Caggiano, Sonya Ahamed, William Lytle, Chelsea Schelly, Kristin Floress, Cara L Cuite, Rachael Shwom

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental studies and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Holly Caggiano86 Olden Street, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-7221
Sonya Ahamed1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University.
William LytleDry Pea and Lentil Council, Moscow, ID USA.
Chelsea Schelly1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931 USA Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University.
Kristin Floress1033 University Place, Evanston, IL 60201 USA Northern Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Cara L Cuite55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University.
Rachael Shwom55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University.
Michigan Technological University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USOnderwijsraad · NLPrinceton University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Capturing the social dynamic processes among household members that work to shape consumption patterns presents a complex problem for household resource conservation studies. To bridge the gap between the individual and household, we propose and test a series of quantitative measures that explore the underlying structure of household social dynamic processes through the lens of social practice theory. Based on previous qualitative research, we develop measures to test five distinct social dynamic processes that either encourage or deter pro-environmental action: enhancing, norming, preferring, constraining, and allocating. In a sample of households (

Indexed as

Behavior changeFood-energy-water nexusHousehold resource consumptionSocial practicesSustainable consumption

Identifiers

PMID37214261
PMCPMC9978271
OpenAlexW4322770523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.