Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214192›Full record

ArticleBiological theory2023

Bearing Fruit: Miocene Apes and Rosaceous Fruit Evolution.

Robert N Spengler, Frank Kienast, Patrick Roberts, Nicole Boivin, David R Begun, Kseniia Ashastina, Michael Petraglia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological theory, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robert N SpenglerJena, Germany Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology.ORCID 0000-0002-5648-6930
Frank KienastSenckenberg Research Station of Quaternary, Palaeontology, Weimar, Germany.
Patrick RobertsJena, Germany Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology.
Nicole BoivinJena, Germany Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology.
David R BegunToronto, Canada Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto.
Kseniia AshastinaJena, Germany Department of Archaeology, Max Planck Institute for Geoanthropology.
Michael PetragliaWashington, DC USA Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extinct megafaunal mammals in the Americas are often linked to seed-dispersal mutualisms with large-fruiting tree species, but large-fruiting species in Europe and Asia have received far less attention. Several species of arboreal Maloideae (apples and pears) and Prunoideae (plums and peaches) evolved large fruits starting around nine million years ago, primarily in Eurasia. As evolutionary adaptations for seed dispersal by animals, the size, high sugar content, and bright colorful visual displays of ripeness suggest that mutualism with megafaunal mammals facilitated the evolutionary change. There has been little discussion as to which animals were likely candidate(s) on the late Miocene landscape of Eurasia. We argue that several possible dispersers could have consumed the large fruits, with endozoochoric dispersal usually relying on guilds of species. During the Pleistocene and Holocene, the dispersal guild likely included ursids, equids, and elephantids. During the late Miocene, large primates were likely also among the members of this guild, and the potential of a long-held mutualism between the ape and apple clades merits further discussion. If primates were a driving factor in the evolution of this large-fruit seed-dispersal system, it would represent an example of seed-dispersal-based mutualism with hominids millions of years prior to crop domestication or the development of cultural practices, such as farming.

Indexed as

ApesMegafaunaMioceneMutualismRosaceaeSeed dispersal

Identifiers

PMID37214192
PMCPMC10191964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.