Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214176›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Methods primers2022

High-content CRISPR screening.

Christoph Bock, Paul Datlinger, Florence Chardon, Matthew A Coelho, Matthew B Dong, Keith A Lawson, Tian Lu, Laetitia Maroc, Thomas M Norman, Bicna Song and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Methods primers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 368 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
368citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

368 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Canon enables causal inference of downstream genes in single-cell CRISPR studies via instrumental variable analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Dual-line Genome-scale CRISPR Screening Enables Robust Target Gene Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

308 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christoph BockCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-6091-3088
Paul DatlingerCeMM Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Florence ChardonDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Matthew A CoelhoWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3737-2468
Matthew B DongDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Keith A LawsonDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tian LuHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Laetitia MarocDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Thomas M NormanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Bicna SongCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Geoff StanleyDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sidi ChenDepartment of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3819-5005
Mathew GarnettWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Wei LiCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2163-7903
Jason MoffatDonnelly Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5663-8586
Lei S QiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Rebecca S ShapiroDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Jay ShendureDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jonathan S WeissmanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Xiaowei ZhuangHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Engineering and Imaging 3D genome structure-function dynamics across time scalesU01DK127405 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BLOBEL, GERD A, PHILLIPS-CREMINS, JENNIFER ELIZABETH · 2020 to 2024
$5.7M
Hi-resolution dynamic imaging of chromosomes in single cells by combined CRISPR imaging and sequential FISHU01EB021240 · NIBIB · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CAI, LONG, QI, LEI STANLEY · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021240NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK127405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR screens are a powerful source of biological discovery, enabling the unbiased interrogation of gene function in a wide range of applications and species. In pooled CRISPR screens, various genetically encoded perturbations are introduced into pools of cells. The targeted cells proliferate under a biological challenge such as cell competition, drug treatment or viral infection. Subsequently, the perturbation-induced effects are evaluated by sequencing-based counting of the guide RNAs that specify each perturbation. The typical results of such screens are ranked lists of genes that confer sensitivity or resistance to the biological challenge of interest. Contributing to the broad utility of CRISPR screens, adaptations of the core CRISPR technology make it possible to activate, silence or otherwise manipulate the target genes. Moreover, high-content read-outs such as single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial imaging help characterize screened cells with unprecedented detail. Dedicated software tools facilitate bioinformatic analysis and enhance reproducibility. CRISPR screening has unravelled various molecular mechanisms in basic biology, medical genetics, cancer research, immunology, infectious diseases, microbiology and other fields. This Primer describes the basic and advanced concepts of CRISPR screening and its application as a flexible and reliable method for biological discovery, biomedical research and drug development - with a special emphasis on high-content methods that make it possible to obtain detailed biological insights directly as part of the screen.

Identifiers

PMID37214176
PMCPMC10200264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.