Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37214054›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Endometrial Receptivity During the Preimplantation Period: A Narrative Review.

Kshitij Bajpai, Neema Acharya, Roshan Prasad, Mayur B Wanjari

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kshitij BajpaiMedicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Neema AcharyaObstetrics and Gynecology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Roshan PrasadMedicine and Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Mayur B WanjariResearch and Development, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND.
Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial receptivity is a complex and critical process fundamental to achieving a successful pregnancy. While researchers have made significant strides in understanding the underlying mechanisms governing endometrial receptivity, effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies remain scarce. This review article aims to elucidate the various factors that contribute to endometrial receptivity, including the hormonal regulation and molecular mechanisms that govern this process, as well as potential biomarkers for assessing endometrial receptivity. One of the major challenges in identifying reliable biomarkers for endometrial receptivity is the intricate nature of the process itself. Nonetheless, recent advances in transcriptomic and proteomic technologies have identified several candidate biomarkers that could potentially enhance our ability to predict endometrial receptivity. Furthermore, emerging technologies such as single-cell RNA sequencing and mass spectrometry-based proteomics hold great promise for providing novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying endometrial receptivity. Despite the lack of reliable biomarkers, various therapeutic strategies have been proposed to improve endometrial receptivity. One promising approach involves the transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which have been shown to increase endometrial thickness and receptivity in both animal models and clinical trials. Growth factors, cytokines, and exosomes derived from MSCs and other cell types may also have therapeutic potential for addressing endometrial dysfunction.

Indexed as

biomarkersendometrial receptivityexosomesinfertilitymesenchymal stem cellsproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID37214054
PMCPMC10198587
OpenAlexW4366454432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.