ArticleCureus2023
Comparative Study of Gabapentin, Clonidine and Placebo in Alleviating the Hemodynamic Changes Due to Tracheal Intubation and Laryngoscopy.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation must be reduced for safe and effective anesthesia. The present study was conducted to compare the efficacy of oral clonidine, gabapentin and placebo in alleviating the hemodynamic changes due to tracheal intubation and laryngoscopy.
methodsThis was a double-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted on 90 patients who were undergoing elective surgery and were randomized into three groups. Group I (n=30) received a placebo, group II (n=30) received gabapentin and group III (n=30) received clonidine as premedication before anesthesia induction. Patient heart rate and pressor response were recorded periodically and compared between the groups.
resultsThere was no significant difference in the baseline heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the groups. HR elevation was observed in all three groups and found to be significant (p=0.0001) but the increase was higher in the placebo (15 min: 80.80± 15.41) and lower in the clonidine group (15 min: 65.53± 12.43). The elevation in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was least and transient in the gabapentin group, as compared to placebo and clonidine group. Intra-operatively, the requirement of opioids was higher in the placebo as compared to clonidine and gabapentin (p < .001).
conclusionClonidine and gabapentin were effective in reducing the hemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.