Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213930›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2023

Evaluating brain modularity benefits of an acting intervention: a discriminant-analysis framework.

Aishwarya Rajesh, Richard Betzel, Ana M Daugherty, Tony Noice, Helga Noice, Pauline L Baniqued, Michelle W Voss, Arthur F Kramer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Aishwarya RajeshDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Richard BetzelDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Ana M DaughertyDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.
Tony NoiceDepartment of Theater and Dance, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, IL, United States.
Helga NoiceDepartment of Theater and Dance, Elmhurst University, Elmhurst, IL, United States.
Pauline L BaniquedUSC Center for Affective Neuroscience, Development, Learning, and Education, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Michelle W VossDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Arthur F KramerDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, United States.
Elmhurst College · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USIndiana University Bloomington · USUniversity of Iowa · USUniversity of Southern California · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Acting Out: Influence of an Acting Intervention on Cognition and Brain FunctionR01AG036682 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MCAULEY, EDWARD · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG036682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Aging is associated with a reduction in brain modularity as well as aspects of executive function, namely, updating, shifting, and inhibition. Previous research has suggested that the aging brain exhibits plasticity. Further, it has been hypothesized that broad-based intervention models may be more effective in eliciting overall gains in executive function than interventions targeted at specific executive skills (e.g., computer-based training). To this end, we designed a 4-week theater-based acting intervention in older adults within an RCT framework. We hypothesized that older adults would show improvements in brain modularity and aspects of executive function, ascribed to the acting intervention. Materials and methods: The participants were 179 adults from the community, aged 60-89 years and on average, college educated. They completed a battery of executive function tasks and resting state functional MRI scans to measure brain network modularity pre- and post-intervention. Participants in the active intervention group ( Results: We noted an increase in brain modularity in the acting group, relative to pre-intervention and controls. Performance on updating tasks were representative of the intervention group. However, post-intervention performance on updating did not interact with the observed increase in brain modularity to distinguish groups. Conclusion: An acting intervention can facilitate improvements in modularity and updating, both of which are sensitive to aging and may confer benefits to daily functioning and the ability to learn.

Indexed as

actingagingbrainexecutive functionmodularity

Identifiers

PMID37213930
PMCPMC10192551
OpenAlexW4368368208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.