ReviewPorto biomedical journal
Dual beta-lactam treatment: Pros and cons.
Review in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and individual bacterial species level meta-analysis of in vitro studies on the efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combined with other antimicrobials against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- Assessment of antimicrobial use among patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital: A prospective observational study using World Health Organization AWaRe and Indian Council of Medical Research guidelines.Indian journal of pharmacology · 2026Observational
- Article
- Synergistic effects of Cyp51 isozyme-specific azole antifungal agents on fungi with multipleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Characterization of the Antibiotic and Copper Resistance of Emergent Species of Onion-PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Case Commentary: Dual β-lactam as part of regimen to treatAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024Article
- The Impact ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The battle against microscopic pathogens has always baffled the scientific community. Nowadays, multidrug-resistant microorganisms lead to high in-hospital mortality, increased hospital stays, and high health-related costs. Treating infections due to these high-resistance pathogens with a low number of antibiotic molecules creates the need for new strategies. Although some already think of a "postantibiotic era" with bacteriophages as the main futuristic weapon in antibacterial armament, others rethink the usage of the already existent drugs. Dual beta-lactam therapy has been used for quite some time as an empirical therapy for some severe infections such as endocarditis or meningitis. However, studies regarding the use of a beta-lactam combination stopped being made a long time ago, and it seems the scientific community has no interest in evaluating this as a treatment option. Could this strategy be applied to treat infections due to multidrug-resistant bacteria? Could this be the answer while waiting for the "postantibiotic era"? What kind of pathogens could we fight using dual beta-lactams? What are the downsides of this strategy? These are some of the questions the authors try to answer in this review. In addition, we try to convince our peers to turn once more into researching beta-lactam combinations and exploring its potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.