ArticleFrontiers in neurology2023
Evaluation of perception threshold and pain in patients with Parkinson's disease using PainVision
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative perioperative pain assessment using PainVisionJournal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Evaluation of postoperative pain by PainVision® PS-2100, a quantitative analyzer for perception and pain in pulmonary resection: a prospective pilot study.Journal of anesthesia · 2026Article
- Association between pain threshold and manifested pain assessed using a PD-specific pain scale in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Predictive Value of Current Perception Threshold for Prognosis of Pulsed Radiofrequency in Patients with Acute Herpetic Neuralgia.Journal of pain research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pain is one of the most frequent non-motor symptoms occurring in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (FRS) have been used for clinical pain assessment, but these assessments are subjective at best. In contrast, PainVision Methods: We recruited 48 patients with PD (PwPD) with pain and 52 PwPD without pain. For patients with pain, we measured current perception threshold, pain equivalent current, and pain intensity using PainVision Results: There was no correlation with either VAS or FRS, whereas only weak correlation was identified for NRS ( Discussion: This new quantitative evaluation method of pain may be suitable as an evaluation tool for future intervention research. Current perception threshold in PwPD was related to the duration and severity of the disease and may be involved in peripheral neuropathy associated with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.