Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213868›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

NRRS: a re-tracing strategy to refine neuron reconstruction.

Yiwei Li, Shengdian Jiang, Liya Ding, Lijuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yiwei LiInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China.
Shengdian JiangInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2277-263X
Liya DingInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1209-875X
Lijuan LiuInstitute for Brain and Intelligence, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9548-6183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is crucial to develop accurate and reliable algorithms for fine reconstruction of neural morphology from whole-brain image datasets. Even though the involvement of human experts in the reconstruction process can help to ensure the quality and accuracy of the reconstructions, automated refinement algorithms are necessary to handle substantial deviations problems of reconstructed branches and bifurcation points from the large-scale and high-dimensional nature of the image data. Our proposed Neuron Reconstruction Refinement Strategy (NRRS) is a novel approach to address the problem of deviation errors in neuron morphology reconstruction. Our method partitions the reconstruction into fixed-size segments and resolves the deviation problems by re-tracing in two steps. We also validate the performance of our method using a synthetic dataset. Our results show that NRRS outperforms existing solutions and can handle most deviation errors. We apply our method to SEU-ALLEN/BICCN dataset containing 1741 complete neuron reconstructions and achieve remarkable improvements in the accuracy of the neuron skeleton representation, the task of radius estimation and axonal bouton detection. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of NRRS in refining neuron morphology reconstruction. Availability and implementation: The proposed refinement method is implemented as a Vaa3D plugin and the source code are available under the repository of vaa3d_tools/hackathon/Levy/refinement. The original fMOST images of mouse brains can be found at the BICCN's Brain Image Library (BIL) (https://www.brainimagelibrary.org). The synthetic dataset is hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/Vaa3D/vaa3d_tools/tree/master/hackathon/Levy/refinement). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID37213868
PMCPMC10199312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.