ArticleBioinformatics advances2023
NRRS: a re-tracing strategy to refine neuron reconstruction.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Proofreading of Digitally Reconstructed Neural Morphology Enhances Accuracy, Scalability, and Standardization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- NeuroXiv: AI-powered open databasing and dynamic mining of brain-wide neuron morphometry.Nature methods · 2025Article
- A Multi-Scale Neuron Morphometry Dataset from Peta-voxel Mouse Whole-Brain Images.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Neuronal diversity and stereotypy at multiple scales through whole brain morphometry.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Full-Spectrum Neuronal Diversity and Stereotypy through Whole Brain Morphometry.Research square · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is crucial to develop accurate and reliable algorithms for fine reconstruction of neural morphology from whole-brain image datasets. Even though the involvement of human experts in the reconstruction process can help to ensure the quality and accuracy of the reconstructions, automated refinement algorithms are necessary to handle substantial deviations problems of reconstructed branches and bifurcation points from the large-scale and high-dimensional nature of the image data. Our proposed Neuron Reconstruction Refinement Strategy (NRRS) is a novel approach to address the problem of deviation errors in neuron morphology reconstruction. Our method partitions the reconstruction into fixed-size segments and resolves the deviation problems by re-tracing in two steps. We also validate the performance of our method using a synthetic dataset. Our results show that NRRS outperforms existing solutions and can handle most deviation errors. We apply our method to SEU-ALLEN/BICCN dataset containing 1741 complete neuron reconstructions and achieve remarkable improvements in the accuracy of the neuron skeleton representation, the task of radius estimation and axonal bouton detection. Our findings demonstrate the critical role of NRRS in refining neuron morphology reconstruction. Availability and implementation: The proposed refinement method is implemented as a Vaa3D plugin and the source code are available under the repository of vaa3d_tools/hackathon/Levy/refinement. The original fMOST images of mouse brains can be found at the BICCN's Brain Image Library (BIL) (https://www.brainimagelibrary.org). The synthetic dataset is hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/Vaa3D/vaa3d_tools/tree/master/hackathon/Levy/refinement). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.