ArticleBioinformatics advances2023
Identification of representative species-specific genes for abundance measurements.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SURE-Pipe: a pipeline to compare genomes and extract shared and unique regions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MAGinator enables accurate profiling of de novo MAGs with strain-level phylogenies.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Metagenomic binning facilitates the reconstruction of genomes and identification of Metagenomic Species Pan-genomes or Metagenomic Assembled Genomes. We propose a method for identifying a set of Results: An initial set of the 100 genes that correlate with the median gene abundance profile of the entity is selected. A variant of the coupon collector's problem was utilized to evaluate the probability of identifying a certain number of unique genes in a sample. This allows us to reject the abundance measurements of strains exhibiting a significantly skewed gene representation. A rank-based negative binomial model is employed to assess the performance of different gene sets across a large set of samples, facilitating identification of an optimal signature gene set for the entity. When benchmarked the method on a synthetic gene catalog, our optimized signature gene sets estimate relative abundance significantly closer to the true relative abundance compared to the starting gene sets extracted from the metagenomic species. The method was able to replicate results from a study with real data and identify around three times as many metagenomic entities. Availability and implementation: The code used for the analysis is available on GitHub: https://github.com/trinezac/SG_optimization. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.