Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213867›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2023

Identification of representative species-specific genes for abundance measurements.

Trine Zachariasen, Anders Østergaard Petersen, Asker Brejnrod, Gisle Alberg Vestergaard, Aron Eklund, Henrik Bjørn Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trine ZachariasenDepartment of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby 2800, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-904X
Anders Østergaard PetersenDepartment of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Asker BrejnrodDepartment of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Gisle Alberg VestergaardDepartment of Health and Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby 2800, Denmark.
Aron EklundClinical Microbiomics A/S, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0861-1001
Henrik Bjørn NielsenClinical Microbiomics A/S, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Metagenomic binning facilitates the reconstruction of genomes and identification of Metagenomic Species Pan-genomes or Metagenomic Assembled Genomes. We propose a method for identifying a set of Results: An initial set of the 100 genes that correlate with the median gene abundance profile of the entity is selected. A variant of the coupon collector's problem was utilized to evaluate the probability of identifying a certain number of unique genes in a sample. This allows us to reject the abundance measurements of strains exhibiting a significantly skewed gene representation. A rank-based negative binomial model is employed to assess the performance of different gene sets across a large set of samples, facilitating identification of an optimal signature gene set for the entity. When benchmarked the method on a synthetic gene catalog, our optimized signature gene sets estimate relative abundance significantly closer to the true relative abundance compared to the starting gene sets extracted from the metagenomic species. The method was able to replicate results from a study with real data and identify around three times as many metagenomic entities. Availability and implementation: The code used for the analysis is available on GitHub: https://github.com/trinezac/SG_optimization. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at

Identifiers

PMID37213867
PMCPMC10199311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.