Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213764›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Didactical characteristics of Dutch websites about kidney transplantation targeted for kidney patients and living donors: An exploratory study.

Charlotte W van Klaveren, Peter G M de Jong, Renée A Hendriks, Franka Luk, Aiko P J de Vries, Paul J M van der Boog, A J Rabelink, Marlies E J Reinders

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 96% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Charlotte W van KlaverenDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Peter G M de JongCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Renée A HendriksCenter for Innovation in Medical Education, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Franka LukDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Aiko P J de VriesDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Paul J M van der BoogDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
A J RabelinkDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marlies E J ReindersDivision of Nephrology and Transplant Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to explore the origin, content topics, teaching modes (instruction, interaction, and assessment), and corresponding social-epistemological dimensions (choices in knowledge transfer vs. knowledge building, and individual vs. group learning) of web-based information on kidney transplantation targeted for patients and living donors. Methods: Dutch websites on kidney transplantation were retrieved using the search engine Results: The majority of the websites had a professional organization as origin (20/24). The number and distribution of content topics varied among the websites. Of the 16 different teaching modes found, 11 were instructional, 4 were interactional, and 1 assessment mode was found. The websites offered almost exclusively teaching modes on individual and passive learning, whereas group learning and interactive knowledge building was hardly encountered. Conclusion: The diversity in teaching modes and social-epistemological dimensions of Dutch websites on kidney transplantation targeted for patients and living donors is limited. The websites only provided a partial view on kidney transplantation; information regarding contact with others, e.g. support, was limited. A more balanced availability of teaching approaches and content topics is desirable to fit with the didactical goals to make well-considered health decisions.

Indexed as

eHealth literacyHealth communicationKidney transplantationPatient educationSocial-epistemological dimensionsTeaching modesWebsites

Identifiers

PMID37213764
PMCPMC10194093
OpenAlexW4220840810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.