Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213763›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

A feasibility study of a best practice health literacy app for Australian adults with chronic kidney disease.

Stephanie Zwi, Jennifer Isautier, Angela C Webster, Kelly Lambert, Heather L Shepherd, Kirsten J McCaffery, Kamal Sud, John Saunders, Emma O'Lone, Na Liu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Stephanie ZwiSydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer IsautierSydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Angela C WebsterSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kelly LambertSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Heather L ShepherdFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kirsten J McCafferySydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kamal SudNepean Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
John SaundersDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Local Health District, NSW, Australia.
Emma O'LoneDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Northern Sydney Local Health District, NSW, Australia.
Na LiuSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jinman KimSchool of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Aphra RobbinsConsumer representative, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Danielle Marie MuscatSydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate feasibility of the SUCCESS app; a cross-platform e-health innovation to improve health literacy, self-management and shared decision-making among culturally-diverse Australian haemodialysis patients. Methods: Multi-site, pre-post, mixed-methods study. Haemodialysis patients ≥18 years used the app for 12 weeks. Qualitative data from 18 interviews were thematically analysed to evaluate app acceptability. Quantitative analysis using paired sampled Results: We successfully recruited diverse participants ( Conclusions: The SUCCESS app was feasible and acceptable to participants. The app will be adapted to facilitate ongoing use and engagement among diverse haemodialysis patients. Innovation: This is the first health literacy-informed app to promote active participation in haemodialysis self-management and decision-making, tailored toward culturally-diverse and low health literacy groups.

Indexed as

Chronic kidney diseaseE-healthEthnic groupsHealth literacyShared decision makingSmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID37213763
PMCPMC10194182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.