ArticlePEC innovation2022
Addressing privacy concerns for mobile and wearable devices sensors: Small-group interviews with healthy adults and cancer survivors.
Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Remote Oral Self-Care Behaviors Assessment System in Vulnerable Populations: Usability and Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Examining the influence of technological self-efficacy, perceived trust, security, and electronic word of mouth on ICT usage in the education sector.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Role of Wearable Sensors in the Future Primary Healthcare - Preferences of the Adult Swiss Population: A Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Mobile and wearable sensor technology is increasingly common and accessible. The aim of this study was to explore individuals' perceptions and acceptability of mobile and wearable sensors, as well as concerns. Methods: Purposive sampling was used to recruit non-patient adults ( Results: Participants reported that privacy was generally not a concern for sensor adoptions for physical activity health interventions except for health insurer access. Conclusion: The patient perspectives as reported in the findings illustrate the need for transparency between potential adopters and users of mobile and wearable devices and health care practitioners, as well as secure privacy policies for health insurers. Innovation: Older adults often are perceived as unwilling to adopt mHealth technologies for many reasons, including privacy concerns. This study examined an important patient population, cancer survivors, who are often overlooked yet may benefit from targeted health interventions using mHealth technologies, and compared their responses with a non-patient population for prevention purposes. Our findings suggest that one's lived health experiences (cancer survivorship) are more influential than one's age in adopting mHealth technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.