Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213744›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Acceptability and perceived feasibility of adapted encounter decision aids on contraceptive methods: An interview study with healthcare providers and Chinese migrant women.

Hankiz Dolan, Deborah Bateson, Mu Li, Rachel Thompson, Chun Wah Michael Tam, Carissa Bonner, Lyndal Trevena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hankiz DolanAsk, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decision (ASK-GP), Centre for Research Excellence, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Deborah BatesonFamily Planning NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Mu LiSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Rachel ThompsonSydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Chun Wah Michael TamPrimary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Carissa BonnerAsk, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decision (ASK-GP), Centre for Research Excellence, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lyndal TrevenaAsk, Share, Know: Rapid Evidence for General Practice Decision (ASK-GP), Centre for Research Excellence, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the perceived acceptability, usefulness, and feasibility of a suite of encounter decision aids (DAs) on contraceptive methods with Chinese migrant women living in Australia and healthcare providers. Methods: Semi-structured in-depth interviews with 22 Chinese migrant women and twenty healthcare providers were conducted. Transcribed data were analysed using the qualitative content analysis method. Results: Women perceived the DAs to be informative and useful. They suggested making the DAs available outside the clinical settings. Healthcare providers perceived the DAs to be comprehensive and valuable in informing women about contraceptive methods. Some providers had concerns as to the information load and the length of the DAs. Such concerns were eased when provided with an explanation of how to use the DAs. Most women and healthcare providers preferred the numerical format for side-effect probability information presentation. Conclusion: Making the encounter DAs available in both the Chinese and English languages can be valuable in assisting Chinese migrant women in making informed decisions about contraceptive methods. Innovation: This study is the first to evaluate the acceptability and perceived feasibility of patient decision aids with members of a migrant community in Australia. The findings highlight the need for disseminating the DAs both within and outside the clinical settings.

Indexed as

ContraceptionDecision AidShared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID37213744
PMCPMC10194123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.