Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213741›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Primary care patients' and providers' perspectives about an online weight management program integrated with population health management: Post-intervention qualitative results from the PROPS study.

Ronen Rozenblum, Barbara A De La Cruz, Nyryan V Nolido, Saffiya McNulty, Katherine D McManus, Florencia Halperin, Jason P Block, David W Bates, Heather J Baer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ronen RozenblumBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Barbara A De La CruzBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nyryan V NolidoBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Saffiya McNultyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine D McManusBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Florencia HalperinBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jason P BlockBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
David W BatesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Heather J BaerBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess patients' and providers' attitudes about the online weight management program and population health management approach in the PROPS Study, which examined the effectiveness of these strategies in primary care. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 22 patients and nine providers. Using thematic analysis, we analyzed transcripts of the interviews to identify key themes. Results: Most patients found the online program to be well-structured and easy to use, although a few noted that the information was overwhelming or could be more personalized. Patients mentioned that the support from the population health managers was critical for their success, and several reported that they would have liked more involvement from their primary care provider or a dietitian. Providers also were satisfied with the interventions, and several stated that the population health management support was helpful because it added accountability. Providers suggested that the interventions could be improved by tailoring the information and integrating the online program with the electronic health record. Conclusion: Most patients and providers were satisfied with the interventions, with several recommendations for improvements. Innovation: These findings give additional information about patients' and providers' experience with this innovative approach for managing overweight and obesity in primary care.

Indexed as

ObesityOnline programOverweightPopulation health managementPrimary careWeight management

Identifiers

PMID37213741
PMCPMC10194385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.