Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213735›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Lifestyle support preferences of patients with cardiovascular diseases: What lifestyle support might work best for whom?

Talia R Cohen Rodrigues, Thomas Reijnders, David R de Buisonjé, Linda D Breeman, Inge van den Broek, Veronica R Janssen, Roderik A Kraaijenhagen, Douwe E Atsma, Andrea W M Evers, BENEFIT consortium

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Talia R Cohen RodriguesHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Thomas ReijndersHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
David R de BuisonjéHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Linda D BreemanHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Inge van den BroekHarteraad, Den Haag, the Netherlands.
Veronica R JanssenHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Roderik A KraaijenhagenNDDO Institute for Prevention and Early Diagnostics (NIPED), Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Douwe E AtsmaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Andrea W M EversHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology Unit, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
BENEFIT consortium
Leiden University · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLDelft University of Technology · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NLHartstichting · NLPharmo Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lifestyle support is essential in preventing and treating cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and eHealth may be an easy and affordable solution to provide this support. However, CVD patients vary in their ability and interest to use eHealth. This study investigates demographic characteristics determining CVD patients' online and offline lifestyle support preferences. Methods: We used a cross-sectional study design. 659 CVD patients (Harteraad panel) completed our questionnaire. We assessed demographic characteristics and preferred lifestyle support type (coach, eHealth, family/friends, self-supportive). Results: Respondents mostly preferred being self-supportive ( Conclusion: Men and older patients are more interested in being self-supportive, and patients with lower levels of social support could need extra support outside their social network. eHealth could provide a solution, but attention should be paid to spike interest for digital interventions among certain groups.

Indexed as

Cardiac careCardiovascular diseasesDigital healtheHealthLifestylePatient perspectivesSelf-management

Identifiers

PMID37213735
PMCPMC10194186
OpenAlexW4292323583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.