Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213722›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2022

Embedding the living well toolkit into service delivery - A complex process.

Suzie Mudge, Nicola Kayes, Deborah Payne, Greta Smith

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Suzie MudgeCentre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Nicola KayesCentre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Deborah PayneCentre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Greta SmithCentre for Person Centred Research, Auckland University of Technology, Private Bag 92006, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Auckland University of Technology · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To embed the Living Well Toolkit package and to understand how it was implemented at each site and to explore the experiences of users. Methods: The toolkit package was introduced in four rehabilitation settings using a tailored implementation process negotiated with each site. The varied data sources were analysed drawing on directed content analysis. Results: Clients with neurological conditions and clinicians initially weighed the merits of the toolkit package. A positive weighing up was prerequisite for deciding to use. Clinicians described considerable Conclusion: Implementation of the toolkit package was a complex process for clinicians and services, involving ongoing work to optimise its impact relative to the client and context. Clinicians and clients who used the toolkit package described positive changes, congruent with person-centred communication. Innovation: The Living Well Toolkit is freely available for all to use. Clinicians who used reflective and responsive thinking to make the toolkit package work found it provided them with a broader perspective of the client.

Indexed as

CommunicationImplementationPerson-centredToolkit

Identifiers

PMID37213722
PMCPMC10194408
OpenAlexW4221000744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.