ArticlePEC innovation2022
Sex education for patients with severe mental illness in Iran: A qualitative study.
Article in PEC innovation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patients with severe mental illness may experience cognitive deficits, impaired judgment or loss of skills. Therefore, they are prone to sexual health complications. Sex education can promote sexual health, and in many countries, it is integrated into other domains of education. The educational contents taught in western countries are not necessarily appropriate for developing countries.This study aims to address sex educational content for these patients in Iran. Methods: We have conducted twenty-three face-to-face, deep and semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, psychiatrists, general practitioners, nurses and psychologists. We used the strategy of maximum diversity in selecting the participants. Results: "Improving basic knowledge," "decreasing the risk of unsafe sex", "empowerment" and "persuading to ask for help" should be covered in the education. Conclusions: Sexuality is not considered a priority for these patients. It is necessary to develop a training program with simple educational content for this high-risk group. Innovation: Raising awareness and knowledge about the possible risks of social media on high-risk behaviours, developing social and behavioural skills, and encouraging patients to talk about their new challenges in sexual life is recommended. Cultural, spiritual and personal beliefs should be considered in designing the educational program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.