Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213656›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2020

Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Complex Sentences: An fMRI Study.

Margreet Vogelzang, Christiane M Thiel, Stephanie Rosemann, Jochem W Rieger, Esther Ruigendijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Executive Function Associations With Audibility-Adjusted Speech Perception in Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margreet VogelzangInstitute of Dutch Studies, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-5419
Christiane M ThielCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Stephanie RosemannCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-0538
Jochem W RiegerCluster of Excellence "Hearing4all," University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Esther RuigendijkInstitute of Dutch Studies, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1211-9407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown effects of syntactic complexity on sentence processing. In linguistics, syntactic complexity (caused by different word orders) is traditionally explained by distinct linguistic operations. This study investigates whether different complex word orders indeed result in distinct patterns of neural activity, as would be expected when distinct linguistic operations are applied. Twenty-two older adults performed an auditory sentence processing paradigm in German with and without increased cognitive load. The results show that without increased cognitive load, complex sentences show distinct activation patterns compared with less complex, canonical sentences: complex object-initial sentences show increased activity in the left inferior frontal and temporal regions, whereas complex adjunct-initial sentences show increased activity in occipital and right superior frontal regions. Increased cognitive load seems to affect the processing of different sentence structures differently, increasing neural activity for canonical sentences, but leaving complex sentences relatively unaffected. We discuss these results in the context of the idea that linguistic operations required for processing sentence structures with higher levels of complexity involve distinct brain operations.

Indexed as

cognitive loadcomplex sentencesfMRIsyntactic processingword orderworking memory

Identifiers

PMID37213656
PMCPMC10158620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.