ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Telemedicine and the standard of care: a call for a new approach?
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resource Use Patterns in US Telehealth Services: Machine Learning and Clustering Analysis Across 4 Specialties.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Liability in Telesurgery: Navigating Legal, Ethical, and Cross-Border Challenges in the Era of Global Surgical Care.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2026Review
- Current status and influencing factors of telehealth readiness among nurses: A multicenter cross-sectional study in Ningxia, China.PloS one · 2026Article
- Self-care strategies and interventions to address antimicrobial resistance: evidence review and recommendations for national programs, service providers, caregivers, and self-carers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Integrating enterprise risk management to address AI-related risks in healthcare: Strategies for effective risk mitigation and implementation.Journal of healthcare risk management : the journal of the American Society for Healthcare Risk Management · 2025Article
- Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues in Metaverse-Enabled Healthcare.Blockchain in healthcare today · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence-assisted chest radiograph interpretation in Role 2 military field hospital settings: a controlled experimental study.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a telemedicine pilot project for hypertension in Korea: a nationwide real-world data study.Epidemiology and health · 2025Article
- Perspectives of Decision Support System TeleRehab in the Management of Post-Stroke Telerehabilitation.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Neurological Examination via Telemedicine: An Updated Review Focusing on Movement Disorders.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Applications to augment patient care for Internal Medicine specialists: a position paper from the EFIM working group on telemedicine, innovative technologies & digital health.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Telemedicine Utilization in Tertiary, Specialized, and Secondary Hospitals in Thailand.Telemedicine reports · 2024Article
- Legal risks of telemedicine in China and its prevention.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telemedicine, understood as the provision of health care by a health professional to a patient who is physically not in the same location as the health professional, has many actual and potential benefits. It also has some disadvantages though, including a higher risk of misdiagnosis or another unfavorable outcome of certain remotely-provided services. In principle, the regime of legal liability for medical malpractice is the same for telemedicine as for traditional physical care. The general outline of the standard of care, which includes respect for medical science, the patient's individuality and objective possibilities, is abstract and flexible enough to be used for remote care without the need for redefinition. The quality of health care should be evaluated on the basis of the whole scale of risks and benefits it brings to a particular patient, including accessibility and comfort. In general, it should be permissible to provide a medical service remotely on the condition that its overall quality is at least as good as its comparable physical alternative. In other words, certain decrease in quality of some aspects of remote care can be compensated by other advantages. In terms of public health, support for telemedicine may bring a great improvement in the access to health care, and thus help significantly the individual members of the population. From the individual perspective, respect for personal autonomy implies that a patient should have every right to opt for a remote service, provided that there exists a true choice between meaningful options which is made on the basis of full information. If telemedicine is to fulfill its potential without sacrificing the protection of patients and their rights, reasonable guidelines for remote services need to be defined for particular medical fields, and for specific procedures within them. Among other issues, these guidelines must address the question of when it is necessary to refer the patient to physical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.