Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213622›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Developing a peer-led intervention to promote COVID-19 testing in low-income housing settings.

Andrew D Plunk, Kapri Hannon, Alexandra Carver, Diane Cooper, Debra Grant, Sudie Greene, Emma Morgan, Sarah Gehlert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew D PlunkDepartment of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Kapri HannonDepartment of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Alexandra CarverDepartment of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Diane CooperHousing Collaborative Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Debra GrantHousing Collaborative Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Sudie GreeneHousing Collaborative Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Emma MorganHousing Collaborative Community Advisory Board, Norfolk, VA, United States.
Sarah GehlertBrown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Using Differences in Perceived Legitimacy and Resident Compliance to Promote Fair and Effective Implementation of Smoke Free HousingR37CA245716 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ENGLAND, KELLI, SHEEHAN, BRYNN · 2020 to 2023
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA245716
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Housing Collaborative project at Eastern Virginia Medical School has developed a method of adapting public health guidance from public housing communities, which face tremendous health challenges in cardiometabolic health, cancer, and other major health conditions. In this paper, we describe how academic and community partners in the Housing Collaborative came together to do this work with a focus on COVID-19 testing in the context of the emerging pandemic. Methods: The academic team used virtual community engagement methods to interact with the Housing Collaborative Community Advisory Board (HCCAB) and a separate cohort of research participants ( Results: Participants reported several important barriers to COVID-19 testing related to distrust in the tests and those administering them. Distrust in housing authorities and how they might misuse positive test results seemed to further undermine decision making about COVID-19 testing. Pain associated with testing was also a concern. To address these concerns, a peer-led testing intervention was proposed by the Housing Collaborative. A second round of focus group interviews was then conducted, in which participants reported their approval of the proposed intervention. Conclusion: Although the COVID-19 pandemic was not our initial focus, we were able to identify a number of barriers to COVID-19 testing in low-income housing settings that can be addressed with adapted public health guidance. We struck a balance between community input and scientific rigor and obtained high quality, honest feedback to inform evidence-based recommendations to guide decisions about health.

Indexed as

COVID-19HousingCOVID-19 TestingHumansPovertyPublic Healthcommunity-based participatory researchCOVID-19distrustpublic housingtesting

Identifiers

PMID37213622
PMCPMC10196028
OpenAlexW4376599947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.