Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Incidence, knowledge, attitude and practice toward needle stick injury among nursing students in Saudi Arabia.

Khalid Al-Mugheed, Sally Mohammed Farghaly, Nadiah A Baghdadi, Islam Oweidat, Majdi M Alzoubi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Study on needle stick injuries during surgery and blunt needle use for reducing occupational exposure and hygiene benefits.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Khalid Al-MugheedAdult Health Nursing and Critical Care, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sally Mohammed FarghalyDepartment of Nursing Management and Education, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nadiah A BaghdadiDepartment of Nursing Management and Education, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Islam OweidatDepartment of Nursing Management, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Majdi M AlzoubiCommunity Health Nursing, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University · SAAl-Zaytoonah University of Jordan · JORiyadh Elm University · SAZarqa University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Needle stick injuries constitute the greatest threat to nursing students during clinical practice because of accidental exposure to body fluids and infected blood. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the prevalence of needle stick injuries and (2) measure the level of knowledge, attitude and practice among nursing students about needle stick injuries. Methods: Three hundred participants undergraduate nursing students at a private college in Saudi Arabia were included, of whom 281 participated, for an effective response rate of 82%. Results: The participants showed good knowledge scores with a mean score of 6.4 (SD = 1.4), and results showed that students had positive attitudes (Mean = 27.1, SD = 4.12). Students reported a low level of needle stick practice (Mean = 14.1, SD = 2.0). The total prevalence of needle stick injuries in the sample was 14.1%. The majority, 65.1%, reported one incidence in the last year, while (24.4%) 15 students reported two incident of needle stick injuries. Recapping was the most prevalent (74.1%), followed by during injection (22.3%). Most students did not write a report (77.4%), and being worried and afraid were the main reasons for non-reports (91.2%). The results showed that female students and seniors scored higher level in all needle stick injuries domains (knowledge, attitude and practice) than male students and juniors. Students who had needle stick injuries more than three times last year reported a lower level of all needle stick injury domains than other groups (Mean = 1.5, SD =1.1; Mean = 19.5, SD =1.1; Mean = 9.5, SD =1.1, respectively). Conclusion: Although the student's showed good knowledge and positive attitudes in NSI, the students reported a low level of needle stick practice. Raising awareness among nursing students and conducting continuing education related to sharp devices and safety and how to write an incident reporting is highly recommended.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeedlestick InjuriesNursesAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSchools, Nursingattitudeincidenceknowledgeneedle stick injurynursing studentspractice

Identifiers

PMID37213613
PMCPMC10192570
OpenAlexW4368368059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.