Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213546›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

PDDD-PreTrain: A Series of Commonly Used Pre-Trained Models Support Image-Based Plant Disease Diagnosis.

Xinyu Dong, Qi Wang, Qianding Huang, Qinglong Ge, Kejun Zhao, Xingcai Wu, Xue Wu, Liang Lei, Gefei Hao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A review of deep learning architectures for plant disease detection.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xinyu DongState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Qi WangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Qianding HuangState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Qinglong GeState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Kejun ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xingcai WuState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Xue WuState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Liang LeiThe School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China.
Gefei HaoState Key Laboratory of Public Big Data, College of Computer Science and Technology, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China.
Guizhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant diseases threaten global food security by reducing crop yield; thus, diagnosing plant diseases is critical to agricultural production. Artificial intelligence technologies gradually replace traditional plant disease diagnosis methods due to their time-consuming, costly, inefficient, and subjective disadvantages. As a mainstream AI method, deep learning has substantially improved plant disease detection and diagnosis for precision agriculture. In the meantime, most of the existing plant disease diagnosis methods usually adopt a pre-trained deep learning model to support diagnosing diseased leaves. However, the commonly used pre-trained models are from the computer vision dataset, not the botany dataset, which barely provides the pre-trained models sufficient domain knowledge about plant disease. Furthermore, this pre-trained way makes the final diagnosis model more difficult to distinguish between different plant diseases and lowers the diagnostic precision. To address this issue, we propose a series of commonly used pre-trained models based on plant disease images to promote the performance of disease diagnosis. In addition, we have experimented with the plant disease pre-trained model on plant disease diagnosis tasks such as plant disease identification, plant disease detection, plant disease segmentation, and other subtasks. The extended experiments prove that the plant disease pre-trained model can achieve higher accuracy than the existing pre-trained model with less training time, thereby supporting the better diagnosis of plant diseases. In addition, our pre-trained models will be open-sourced at https://pd.samlab.cn/ and Zenodo platform https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7856293.

Identifiers

PMID37213546
PMCPMC10194370
OpenAlexW4367393787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.