Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213545›Full record

ArticlePlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.)2023

High-Throughput Field Plant Phenotyping: A Self-Supervised Sequential CNN Method to Segment Overlapping Plants.

Xingche Guo, Yumou Qiu, Dan Nettleton, Patrick S Schnable

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xingche GuoDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Yumou QiuDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Dan NettletonDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Patrick S SchnablePlant Sciences Institute, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Iowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput plant phenotyping-the use of imaging and remote sensing to record plant growth dynamics-is becoming more widely used. The first step in this process is typically plant segmentation, which requires a well-labeled training dataset to enable accurate segmentation of overlapping plants. However, preparing such training data is both time and labor intensive. To solve this problem, we propose a plant image processing pipeline using a self-supervised sequential convolutional neural network method for in-field phenotyping systems. This first step uses plant pixels from greenhouse images to segment nonoverlapping in-field plants in an early growth stage and then applies the segmentation results from those early-stage images as training data for the separation of plants at later growth stages. The proposed pipeline is efficient and self-supervising in the sense that no human-labeled data are needed. We then combine this approach with functional principal components analysis to reveal the relationship between the growth dynamics of plants and genotypes. We show that the proposed pipeline can accurately separate the pixels of foreground plants and estimate their heights when foreground and background plants overlap and can thus be used to efficiently assess the impact of treatments and genotypes on plant growth in a field environment by computer vision techniques. This approach should be useful for answering important scientific questions in the area of high-throughput phenotyping.

Identifiers

PMID37213545
PMCPMC10194366
OpenAlexW4367051462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.