ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology
Adaptive Positron Emission Tomography Radiation Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Vulvar Cancer: A Prospective Study.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In this prospective trial, we aim to determine whether fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT)-based adaptive radiation therapy (ART) improves dosimetry outcomes for patients treated with definitive radiation for locally advanced vulvar cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients were enrolled in 2 sequential institutional review board-approved prospective protocols for PET/CT ART from 2012 to 2020. Patients were planned with pretreatment PET/CT to 45 to 56 Gy in 1.8 Gy/fraction, followed by a boost to gross disease (nodal and/or primary) to a total of 64 to 66 Gy. Intratreatment PET/CT was obtained at 30 to 36 Gy, and all patients were replanned to the same dose goals with revised organ at risk (OAR), gross tumor volume, and planned target volume contours. Radiation therapy consisted of either intensity modulated radiation therapy or volumetric modulated arc therapy. Toxicity was graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and time to toxicity were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Dosimetry metrics for OARs were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Twenty patients were eligible for analysis. Median follow-up among surviving patients was 5.5 years. Local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival at 2 years were 63%, 43%, and 68%, respectively. ART significantly reduced the following OAR doses: bladder, maximum dose (D Conclusions: Doses to bladder, bowel, and rectum were significantly improved with ART, though the median magnitudes were modest. Which patients benefit most from adaptive treatment is a matter for future investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.