Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213435›Full record

ArticleStatistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics2022

Learning and Predicting from Dynamic Models for COVID-19 Patient Monitoring.

Zitong Wang, Mary Grace Bowring, Antony Rosen, Brian Garibaldi, Scott Zeger, Akihiko Nishimura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zitong WangDepartment of Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mary Grace BowringDepartments of Biomedical Engineering and Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Antony RosenThe Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brian GaribaldiDepartment of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Scott ZegerDepartment of Biostatistics and Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Akihiko NishimuraDepartment of Biostatistics, The Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

QAQC Johns Hopkins Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR003098 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2019 to 2023
$57.7M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM136577 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ANDREA L COX · 2020 to 2026
$13.4M
Virology Resource CoreU54CA260492 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KLEIN, SABRA L. · 2020 to 2024
$10.4M
Sample Processing and Immunoassay Research CoreP30AR070254 · NIAMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CLIFTON O BINGHAM, Antony Rosen · 2016 to 2026
$8.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003098NCI NIH HHS U54 CA260492NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070254NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has challenged health systems to learn how to learn. This paper describes the context, methods and challenges for learning to improve COVID-19 care at one academic health center. Challenges to learning include: (1) choosing a right clinical target; (2) designing methods for accurate predictions by borrowing strength from prior patients' experiences; (3) communicating the methodology to clinicians so they understand and trust it; (4) communicating the predictions to the patient at the moment of clinical decision; and (5) continuously evaluating and revising the methods so they adapt to changing patients and clinical demands. To illustrate these challenges, this paper contrasts two statistical modeling approaches - prospective longitudinal models in common use and retrospective analogues complementary in the COVID-19 context - for predicting future biomarker trajectories and major clinical events. The methods are applied to and validated on a cohort of 1,678 patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the early months of the pandemic. We emphasize graphical tools to promote physician learning and inform clinical decision making.

Indexed as

decision supportinverse regressionlongitudinal data analysispredictionstatistical graphics

Identifiers

PMID37213435
PMCPMC10198065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.