Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213426›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2023

Investigation of Blood Plasma Viral Nucleocapsid Antigen as a Marker of Active Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Omicron Variant Infection.

Gregory L Damhorst, Nils Schoof, Phuong-Vi Nguyen, Hans Verkerke, Eli Wilber, Kaleb McLendon, William O'Sick, Tyler Baugh, Suneethamma Cheedarla, Narayanaiah Cheedarla and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory L DamhorstDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2237-1713
Nils SchoofDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Phuong-Vi NguyenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hans VerkerkeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Eli WilberDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kaleb McLendonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
William O'SickDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tyler BaughDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Suneethamma CheedarlaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Narayanaiah CheedarlaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Victoria StittleburgDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Eric C FittsDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Margaret A NejaDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Ahmed BabikerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0578-4871
Anne PiantadosiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-1534
John D RobackDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jesse J WaggonerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Maud MavignerDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Wilbur A LamThe Atlanta Center for Microsystems-Engineered Point-of-Care Technologies, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University · USGeorgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Technology Training and Dissemination CoreU54EB027690 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Wilbur A Lam · 2018 to 2026
$96.1M
Implementing a Maternal health and PRegnancy Outcomes Vision for Everyone (IMPROVE)UL1TR002378 · NCATS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Andres J Garcia, Elizabeth O. Ofili · 2017 to 2026
$92.1M
Project-004U54CA260563 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DHODAPKAR, MADHAV V, SANZ, IGNACIO E. · 2020 to 2024
$10.2M
Training Grant in Transfusion Medicine (T32)T32HL069769 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Una T O'Doherty, John D Roback · 2004 to 2026
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA260563NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069769NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB027690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal qualitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard for diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is not practical or sufficient in every clinical scenario due to its inability to distinguish active from resolved infection. Alternative or adjunct testing may be needed to guide isolation precautions and treatment in patients admitted to the hospital. Methods: We performed a single-center, retrospective analysis of residual clinical specimens and medical record data to examine blood plasma nucleocapsid antigen as a candidate biomarker of active SARS-CoV-2. Adult patients admitted to the hospital or presenting to the emergency department with SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid (RNA) detected by RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab specimen were included. Both nasopharyngeal swab and a paired whole blood sample were required to be available for analysis. Results: Fifty-four patients were included. Eight patients had positive nasopharyngeal swab virus cultures, 7 of whom (87.5%) had concurrent antigenemia. Nineteen (79.2%) of 24 patients with detectable subgenomic RNA and 20 (80.0%) of 25 patients with N2 RT-PCR cycle threshold ≤ 33 had antigenemia. Conclusions: Most individuals with active SARS-CoV-2 infection are likely to have concurrent antigenemia, but there may be some individuals with active infection in whom antigenemia is not detectable. The potential for high sensitivity and convenience of a blood test prompts interest in further investigation as a screening tool to reduce reliance on nasopharyngeal swab sampling and as an adjunct diagnostic test to aid in clinical decision making during the period after acute coronavirus disease 2019.

Indexed as

antigenemiaCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2virus culture

Identifiers

PMID37213426
PMCPMC10199120
OpenAlexW4367852443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.