Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213399›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of gastroenterology2023

Different types of fruit intake and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies.

Zhen-Ying Wu, Jia-Li Chen, Han Li, Ke Su, Yun-Wei Han

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of gastroenterology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deciphering the impact of dietary habits and behavioral patterns on colorectal cancer.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Common Risk Factors in Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Narrative Review.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhen-Ying WuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646099, Sichuan Province, China.
Jia-Li ChenDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646099, Sichuan Province, China.
Han LiDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646099, Sichuan Province, China.
Ke SuDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646099, Sichuan Province, China.
Yun-Wei HanDepartment of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646099, Sichuan Province, China. lanpaoxiansheng@126.com.
Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple studies investigating the relationship between intake of different types of fruit and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk have yielded inconsistent results.

aimTo perform a meta-analysis of existing studies to assess the association between the intake of different kinds of fruit and the incidence of CRC.

methodsWe searched online literature databases including PubMed, Embase, WOS, and Cochrane Library for relevant articles available up to August 2022. With data extracted from observational studies, odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were assessed using random-effects models. A funnel plot and Egger's test were used to determine publication bias. Furthermore, subgroup analysis and dose-response analysis were performed. All analyses were conducted using R (version 4.1.3).

resultsTwenty-four eligible studies involving 1068158 participants were included in this review. The meta-analysis showed that compared to a low intake, a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi reduced the risk of CRC by 9% [OR (95%CI) = 0.91 (0.85-0.97)], 25% [OR (95%CI) = 0.75 (0.66-0.85)], 26% [OR (95%CI) = 0.74 (0.58-0.94)], 13% [OR (95%CI) = 0.87 (0.78-0.96)], respectively. No significant association was observed between the intake of other types of fruit and the risk of CRC. In the dose-response analysis, a nonlinear association was found [R (95%CI) = -0.0031 (-0.0047 to -0.0014)] between citrus intake and CRC risk (

conclusionWe found that a higher intake of citrus, apples, watermelon, and kiwi was negatively associated with the risk of CRC, while the intake of other types of fruits were not significantly associated with CRC. Citrus intake showed a non-linear dose-response relationship with the risk of CRC. This meta-analysis provides further evidence that a higher intake of specific types of fruit is effective in preventing the occurrence of CRC.

Indexed as

CitrusColorectal NeoplasmsDietFruitRisk FactorsColorectal cancerDoseFruitMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37213399
PMCPMC10198059
OpenAlexW4372348067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.