ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Deep-learning-based automatic segmentation and classification for craniopharyngiomas.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning model for automated segmentation of sphenoid sinus and middle skull base structures in CBCT volumes using nnU-Net v2.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Radiomic Applications in Skull Base Pathology: A Systematic Review of Potential Clinical Uses.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2025Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery: Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Deep learning-driven brain tumor classification and segmentation using non-contrast MRI.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning for Automated Prediction of Sphenoid Sinus Pneumatization in Computed TomographyCurrent medical imaging · 2025Article
- Impact of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma on limbic system and its correlation with cognitive impairment.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Neuronavigation and classification of craniopharyngiomas can guide surgical approaches and prognostic information. The QST classification has been developed according to the origin of craniopharyngiomas; however, accurate preoperative automatic segmentation and the QST classification remain challenging. This study aimed to establish a method to automatically segment multiple structures in MRIs, detect craniopharyngiomas, and design a deep learning model and a diagnostic scale for automatic QST preoperative classification. Methods: We trained a deep learning network based on sagittal MRI to automatically segment six tissues, including tumors, pituitary gland, sphenoid sinus, brain, superior saddle cistern, and lateral ventricle. A deep learning model with multiple inputs was designed to perform preoperative QST classification. A scale was constructed by screening the images. Results: The results were calculated based on the fivefold cross-validation method. A total of 133 patients with craniopharyngioma were included, of whom 29 (21.8%) were diagnosed with type Q, 22 (16.5%) with type S and 82 (61.7%) with type T. The automatic segmentation model achieved a tumor segmentation Dice coefficient of 0.951 and a mean tissue segmentation Dice coefficient of 0.8668 for all classes. The automatic classification model and clinical scale achieved accuracies of 0.9098 and 0.8647, respectively, in predicting the QST classification. Conclusions: The automatic segmentation model can perform accurate multi-structure segmentation based on MRI, which is conducive to clearing tumor location and initiating intraoperative neuronavigation. The proposed automatic classification model and clinical scale based on automatic segmentation results achieve high accuracy in the QST classification, which is conducive to developing surgical plans and predicting patient prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.