Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213280›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2023

Liquid biopsies and minimal residual disease in myeloid malignancies.

Sabine Allam, Kristina Nasr, Farhan Khalid, Zunairah Shah, Mahammed Ziauddin Khan Suheb, Sana Mulla, Sindhu Vikash, Maroun Bou Zerdan, Faiz Anwer, Chakra P Chaulagain

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine AllamDepartment of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Dekwaneh, Lebanon.
Kristina NasrDepartment of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Dekwaneh, Lebanon.
Farhan KhalidDepartment of Internal Medicine, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, United States.
Zunairah ShahDepartment of Internal Medicine, Weiss Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL, United States.
Mahammed Ziauddin Khan SuhebDepartment of Internal Medicine, St. Luke's hospital, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Sana MullaDepartment of Internal Medicine, St Mary's Medical Center, Apple Valley, CA, United States.
Sindhu VikashDepartment of Medicine, Jacobi Medical center/AECOM Bronx, Bronx, NY, United States.
Maroun Bou ZerdanDepartment of Internal Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, New York, NY, United States.
Faiz AnwerDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Chakra P ChaulagainDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Maroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States.
University of Balamand · LBCleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Florida · USJacobi Medical Center · USMonmouth Medical Center · USSt. Mary's Medical Center · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · USWeiss Memorial Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment through blood component sampling by liquid biopsies (LBs) is increasingly being investigated in myeloid malignancies. Blood components then undergo molecular analysis by flow cytometry or sequencing techniques and can be used as a powerful tool for prognostic and predictive purposes in myeloid malignancies. There is evidence and more is evolving about the quantification and identification of cell-based and gene-based biomarkers in myeloid malignancies to monitor treatment response. MRD based acute myeloid leukemia protocol and clinical trials are currently incorporating LB testing and preliminary results are encouraging for potential widespread use in clinic in the near future. MRD monitoring using LBs are not standard in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) but this is an area of active investigation. In the future, LBs can replace more invasive techniques such as bone marrow biopsies. However, the routine clinical application of these markers continues to be an issue due to lack of standardization and limited number of studies investigating their specificities. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) could help simplify the complex interpretation of molecular testing and reduce errors related to operator dependency. Though the field is rapidly evolving, the applicability of MRD testing using LB is mostly limited to research setting at this time due to the need for validation, regulatory approval, payer coverage, and cost issues. This review focuses on the types of biomarkers, most recent research exploring MRD and LB in myeloid malignancies, ongoing clinical trials, and the future of LB in the setting of AI.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiaacute myeloid leukemia (AML)artificial intelligence - AIblood biomarkersliquid biopsiesminimal residual disease (MRD)myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)myeloid malignancies

Identifiers

PMID37213280
PMCPMC10196237
OpenAlexW4377220235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.