Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213216›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2023

Modeling inducible neuropathologies of the retina with differential phenotypes in organoids.

Manuela Völkner, Felix Wagner, Thomas Kurth, Alex M Sykes, Claudia Del Toro Runzer, Lynn J A Ebner, Cagri Kavak, Vasileia Ismini Alexaki, Peter Cimalla, Mirko Mehner and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Live Imaging Microscopy of Human Retina Organoids: Photoreceptor Pathology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Manuela VölknerTechnische Universität Dresden, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Dresden, Germany.
Felix WagnerTechnische Universität Dresden, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Dresden, Germany.
Thomas KurthTechnische Universität Dresden, Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technology Platform Core Facility Electron Microscopy and Histology, Dresden, Germany.
Alex M SykesMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany.
Claudia Del Toro RunzerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.
Lynn J A EbnerGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.
Cagri KavakGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Dresden, Germany.
Vasileia Ismini AlexakiTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Peter CimallaTechnische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Mirko MehnerTechnische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Edmund KochTechnische Universität Dresden, Carl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Sensoring and Monitoring, Dresden, Germany.
Mike O KarlTechnische Universität Dresden, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD), Dresden, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DECenter for Systems Biology Dresden · DEMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases remain incompletely understood and therapies are needed. Stem cell-derived organoid models facilitate fundamental and translational medicine research. However, to which extent differential neuronal and glial pathologic processes can be reproduced in current systems is still unclear. Here, we tested 16 different chemical, physical, and cell functional manipulations in mouse retina organoids to further explore this. Some of the treatments induce differential phenotypes, indicating that organoids are competent to reproduce distinct pathologic processes. Notably, mouse retina organoids even reproduce a complex pathology phenotype with combined photoreceptor neurodegeneration and glial pathologies upon combined (not single) application of HBEGF and TNF, two factors previously associated with neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacological inhibitors for MAPK signaling completely prevent photoreceptor and glial pathologies, while inhibitors for Rho/ROCK, NFkB, and CDK4 differentially affect them. In conclusion, mouse retina organoids facilitate reproduction of distinct and complex pathologies, mechanistic access, insights for further organoid optimization, and modeling of differential phenotypes for future applications in fundamental and translational medicine research.

Indexed as

gliamouse embryonic stem (mES) cellsmouse organoidneurodegenerationneuronpathology modelingphotoreceptorretina

Identifiers

PMID37213216
PMCPMC10196395
OpenAlexW4377221234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.