Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37213048›Full record

Trial reportSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Maternal and Fetal Cardiovascular Responses to Acute High-Intensity Interval and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Exercise During Pregnancy: A Randomized Crossover Trial.

Jenna B Wowdzia, Tom J Hazell, Emily R Vanden Berg, Lawrence Labrecque, Patrice Brassard, Margie H Davenport

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05369247 (Effects of Acute High-intensity Intervals Versus Moderate-intensity Continuous Cycling on Maternal and Fetal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05369247 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of Acute High-intensity Intervals Versus Moderate-intensity Continuous Cycling on Maternal and Fetal Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2020 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsPregnancy Related, Glucose, Low Blood, Fetal Heart Rate or Rhythm Abnormality Affecting Fetus, Fetal Blood FlowArmsHigh intensity Interval Training, Moderate Intensity Continuous Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Rethinking Prenatal and Postpartum Exercise.Delaware journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jenna B WowdziaProgram for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, 8602-112 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G, Canada.
Tom J HazellDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Faculty of Science, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Emily R Vanden BergProgram for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, 8602-112 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G, Canada.
Lawrence LabrecqueDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Patrice BrassardDepartment of Kinesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universite Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Margie H DavenportProgram for Pregnancy and Postpartum Health, Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, Women and Children's Health Research Institute, Alberta Diabetes Institute, University of Alberta, 1-052 Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Research Innovation, 8602-112 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G, Canada. margie.davenport@ualberta.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5627-5773

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-07219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to compare maternal and fetal cardiovascular responses to an acute bout of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) during pregnancy.

methodsFifteen women with a singleton pregnancy (27.3 ± 3.5 weeks of gestation, 33 ± 4 years of age) were recruited. Following a peak fitness test, participants engaged in a session of HIIT (10 × 1-min intervals ≥ 90% maximum heart rate [HR

resultsAverage maternal heart rate was higher for HIIT (82 ± 5% HR

conclusionsAn acute bout of HIIT exercise consisting of repeated 1-min near-maximal to maximal exertions, as well as MICT exercise is well tolerated by both mother and fetus. CLINICAL

trial registrationNCT05369247.

Indexed as

ExerciseHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingBlood PressureCross-Over StudiesFemaleFetusHeartHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37213048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.