ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023
A nomogram risk prediction model for poor outcome of primary brainstem hemorrhage based on clinical data and radiographic features.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stereotactic Hematoma Aspiration Versus Standard Treatment for Brainstem Hemorrhage-Updated Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis.Stroke research and treatment · 2026Review
- Predicting early functional outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in endovascular coiling and surgical clipping.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Stereotactic hematoma puncture and drainage for primary pontine hemorrhage: Clinical outcomes and predictive model.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePrimary brainstem hemorrhage (PBSH) is a devastating acute neurological disorder with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with poor outcomes in PBSH patients and develop a novel nomogram for predicting prognosis, with external validation.
methodsA total of 379 patients with PBSH were included in the training cohort. The primary outcome of interest was a modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of 4-6 at 90 days post-onset. Multivariable logistic regression was used to construct a nomogram based on relevant variables. Model performance was tested in the training cohort and externally validated for discriminatory ability, calibration, and clinical utility at a separate institution. The nomogram was also compared to the ICH score in terms of predictive ability.
resultsThe poor outcome rate at 90 days was 57.26% (217/379) in the training cohort and 61.27% (106/173) in the validation cohort. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified age, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and hematoma size as significant risk factors for poor outcomes. Nomograms based on these variables demonstrated good discrimination, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.855 and 0.836 in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the nomogram showed superior predictive value to the ICH score for the 90-day outcome in both cohorts.
conclusionThis study developed and externally validated a nomogram risk prediction model for predicting poor outcomes at 90 days in patients with PBSH, using age, GCS score, and hematoma size as predictors. The nomogram demonstrated good discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity, serving as a valuable assessment and decision-making tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37213039What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.