Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212952›Full record

ArticleInflammation2023

Bacterial and Metabolic Factors of Staphylococcal Planktonic and Biofilm Environments Differentially Regulate Macrophage Immune Activation.

Elisabeth Seebach, Tabea Elschner, Franziska V Kraus, Margarida Souto-Carneiro, Katharina F Kubatzky

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Virulence · 2023
    Article
  9. Staphylococci planktonic and biofilm environments differentially affect osteoclast formation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth SeebachDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. elisabeth.seebach@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Tabea ElschnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Franziska V KrausDepartment of Internal Medicine 5 - Hematology Oncology Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Margarida Souto-CarneiroDepartment of Internal Medicine 5 - Hematology Oncology Rheumatology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 410, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina F KubatzkyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. kubatzky@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-9329
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofilm formation is a leading cause for chronic implant-related bone infections as biofilms shield bacteria against the immune system and antibiotics. Additionally, biofilms generate a metabolic microenvironment that shifts the immune response towards tolerance. Here, we compared the impact of the metabolite profile of bacterial environments on macrophage immune activation using Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and epidermidis (SE) conditioned media (CM) of planktonic and biofilm cultures. The biofilm environment had reduced glucose and increased lactate concentrations. Moreover, the expression of typical immune activation markers on macrophages was reduced in the biofilm environment compared to the respective planktonic CM. However, all CM caused a predominantly pro-inflammatory macrophage cytokine response with a comparable induction of Tnfa expression. In biofilm CM, this was accompanied by higher levels of anti-inflammatory Il10. Planktonic CM, on the other hand, induced an IRF7 mediated Ifnb gene expression which was absent in the biofilm environments. For SA but not for SE planktonic CM, this was accompanied by IRF3 activation. Stimulation of macrophages with TLR-2/-9 ligands under varying metabolic conditions revealed that, like in the biofilm setting, low glucose concentration reduced the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio. However, the addition of extracellular L-lactate but not D-lactate increased the Tnfa to Il10 mRNA ratio upon TLR-2/-9 stimulation. In summary, our data indicate that the mechanisms behind the activation of macrophages differ between planktonic and biofilm environments. These differences are independent of the metabolite profiles, suggesting that the production of different bacterial factors is ultimately more important than the concentrations of glucose and lactate in the environment.

Indexed as

Interleukin-10Staphylococcal InfectionsBiofilmsHumansLactatesMacrophagesPlanktonStaphylococcus aureusToll-Like Receptor 2Interleukin-10LactatesToll-Like Receptor 2BiofilmImmune responseImplant-related bone infectionsMacrophagesMetabolites.Staphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID37212952
PMCPMC10359233
OpenAlexW4377220187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.