Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212933›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023

Critical Appraisal of Proton Therapy for Patients with Central Nervous System (CNS) Malignancies.

Jennifer Kahan, Constanza Martinez, Christina Tsien

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jennifer KahanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Constanza MartinezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Christina TsienDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, 1001 Decarie Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. christina.tsien@gmail.com.
McGill University Health Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAs more hospital-based proton treatment centres become operational, the indications for proton beam therapy (PBT) are being evaluated. Recent advances in PBT technology are expanding the indications for the use of protons in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Prospective trials that assess the late toxicity of different radiation therapy (RT) techniques are needed to confirm any expected reduction in long-term side effects with PBT. The ASTRO Model Policy on proton beam therapy currently supports the reasonable use of protons in the treatment of specific CNS tumour types. Specifically, PBT plays a key role in the management of CNS tumours where anatomy, extent of disease or previous treatment cannot be satisfactorily addressed with conventional RT. As the availability of PBT rises around the world, the number of patients with CNS disease treated with PBT will continue to grow.

Indexed as

Central Nervous System NeoplasmsProton TherapyCentral Nervous SystemHumansProspective StudiesProtonsProtonsCentral nervous system malignanciesPencil beamProton beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID37212933
OpenAlexW4377221133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.