Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212926›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2023

Preoperative predictors of success after transvaginal rectocoele repair.

Linda Ferrari, Karina Cuinas, Alison Hainsworth, Amir Darakhshan, Alexis Schizas, Cornelius Kelleher, Andrew Brian Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda FerrariPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK. linda_ferrari@libero.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-0101
Karina CuinasPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
Alison HainsworthPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
Amir DarakhshanPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
Alexis SchizasPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
Cornelius KelleherPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
Andrew Brian WilliamsPelvic Floor Unit, Mitchener Ward, St Thomas' Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE17EH, UK.
St Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDetermine predictors of success for transvaginal rectocoele repair (TVRR). Primary aim is to establish predictors of successful treatment analysing patients' characteristics, baseline symptoms, pelvic floor test results and pre-operative conservative treatment.

methodsRetrospective single institution study in a tertiary referral centre for pelvic floor disorders. 207 patients underwent TVRR for symptomatic rectocoele. Information about symptoms related to obstructive defaecation, anal incontinence and vaginal prolapse, results of pelvic floor investigations, multimodality conservative management and variation in surgical technique have been recorded. Symptom related information have been collected at surgical follow-up.

results115 patients had residual symptoms after surgical repair of rectocoele, while 97 were symptoms free. Factors associated with residual symptoms after surgical repair are previous proctological procedures, urge AI symptoms, absence of vaginal bulge symptoms, use of transanal irrigation and having a concomitant enterocoele repair during procedure.

conclusionFactors able to predict a less favourable outcome after TVRR in patients with concomitant ODS are previous proctological procedures, presence of urge AI, short anal canal length on anorectal physiology, seepage on defaecating proctography, use of transanal irrigation, absence of vaginal bulge symptoms and enterocoele repair during surgery. These information are important for a tailored decision making process and to manage patients' expectations before surgical repair.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceRectoceleConstipationDefecographyFemaleHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeObstructive defaecation syndromePredictors successRectocoeleTransvaginal rectocoele repair

Identifiers

PMID37212926
OpenAlexW4377220760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.