ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2023
An Overview of 10 Years of Activity of a Molecular Laboratory for Buruli Ulcer Diagnosis at a Field Hospital in Benin.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Buruli ulcer (BU) is a neglected tropical disease caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent morbidity. In November 2012, a field laboratory fully equipped for the rapid on-site quantitative PCR (qPCR) diagnosis of M. ulcerans was established at the Buruli ulcer treatment center (CDTLUB) center in Pobè Benin, a region where BU is endemic. We describe its first 10 years of activity and its gradual evolution into an expert laboratory for BU diagnosis. From 2012 to 2022, the laboratory analyzed 3,018 samples from patients attending consultations for suspected BU at the CDTLUB in Pobè. Ziehl-Neelsen staining and qPCR targeting the IS2404 sequence were performed. Since 2019, the laboratory has also received and analyzed 570 samples from other centers. The laboratory confirmed the diagnosis of BU by qPCR for 39.7% samples: M. ulcerans DNA was detected in 34.7% of swabs, 47.2% of all fine needle aspiration samples (FNA) and 44.6% of all skin biopsy specimens. Positive Ziehl-Neelsen staining results were obtained for 19.0% samples. Bacterial load, estimated by qPCR, was significantly greater for the Ziehl-Neelsen-positive samples than for Ziehl-Neelsen-negative samples, and detection rates were highest for FNA samples. Overall, 26.3% of the samples received from other centers were positive for BU. Most of these samples were sent by the CDTLUBs of Lalo, Allada, and Zagnanado, Benin. The establishment of the laboratory in the CDTLUB of Pobè has been a huge success. Optimal patient care depends on the close proximity of a molecular biology structure to BU treatment centers. Finally, FNA should be promoted among caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.