Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212685›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2023

Abiotic and Biotic Drivers of Soil Fungal Communities in Response to Dairy Manure Amendment.

Daniel C Schlatter, Joshua D Gamble, Sarah Castle, Julia Rogers, Melissa Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel C SchlatterUSDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4695-8367
Joshua D GambleUSDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Sarah CastleUSDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Julia RogersDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Melissa WilsonDepartment of Soil, Water, and Climate, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, Minnesota, USA.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern agriculture often relies on large inputs of synthetic fertilizers to maximize crop yield potential, yet their intensive use has led to nutrient losses and impaired soil health. Alternatively, manure amendments provide plant available nutrients, build organic carbon, and enhance soil health. However, we lack a clear understanding of how consistently manure impacts fungal communities, the mechanisms via which manure impacts soil fungi, and the fate of manure-borne fungi in soils. We assembled soil microcosms using five soils to investigate how manure amendments impact fungal communities over a 60-day incubation. Further, we used autoclaving treatments of soils and manure to determine if observed changes in soil fungal communities were due to abiotic or biotic properties, and if indigenous soil communities constrained colonization of manure-borne fungi. We found that manure amended soil fungal communities diverged from nonamended communities over time, often in concert with a reduction in diversity. Fungal communities responded to live and autoclaved manure in a similar manner, suggesting that abiotic forces are primarily responsible for the observed dynamics. Finally, manure-borne fungi declined quickly in both live and autoclaved soil, indicating that the soil environment is unsuitable for their survival.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomeAgricultureManureSoilSoil MicrobiologyManureSoilcommunity assemblydairy manureecological resistanceenvironmental filterssoil fungi

Identifiers

PMID37212685
PMCPMC10304672
OpenAlexW4377220256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.