Trial reportCirculation2023
Effect of Torsemide Versus Furosemide on Symptoms and Quality of Life Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure: The TRANSFORM-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Circulation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03296813 (TRANSFORM-HF), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
TRANSFORM-HF: ToRsemide compArisoN With furoSemide FORManagement of Heart Failure
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative effectiveness of torsemide vs furosemide in the management of heart failure patients: Win-ratio reanalysis of the TRANSFORM-HF trial.American heart journal · 2026Trial
- On-treatment analysis of torsemide versus furosemide for patients hospitalized for heart failure: A post-hoc analysis of TRANSFORM-HF.European journal of heart failure · 2024Trial
- Torsemide Versus Furosemide After Discharge in Patients Hospitalized With Heart Failure Across the Spectrum of Ejection Fraction: Findings From TRANSFORM-HF.Circulation. Heart failure · 2024Trial
- Personalized Sequential Nephron Blockade for Diuretic Resistance in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Narrative Review for the Cardiorenal Clinician.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Furosemide and the Symptom Burden: The Potential Mediating Role of Uremic Toxins in Patients with CKD.Toxins · 2025Article
- Diuretic Use in Heart Failure.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Heart Failure Readmission Prevention Strategies-A Comparative Review of Medications, Devices, and Other Interventions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Diuretics: a review of the pharmacology and effects on glucose homeostasis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Effects of bisoprolol combined with torasemide on cardiac electrophysiology in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- TRANSFORM-HF Trial: Choice of loop diuretic in acute heart failure does not matter!Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Review
- Decongestion in Acute Heart Failure-Time to Rethink and Standardize Current Clinical Practice?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Advancing Cardiorenal Interaction: From Pathophysiological Paradigms to Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLoop diuretics are a primary therapy for the symptomatic treatment of heart failure (HF), but whether torsemide improves patient symptoms and quality of life better than furosemide remains unknown. As prespecified secondary end points, the TRANSFORM-HF trial (Torsemide Comparison With Furosemide for Management of Heart Failure) compared the effect of torsemide versus furosemide on patient-reported outcomes among patients with HF.
methodsTRANSFORM-HF was an open-label, pragmatic, randomized trial of 2859 patients hospitalized for HF (regardless of ejection fraction) across 60 hospitals in the United States. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to a loop diuretic strategy of torsemide or furosemide with investigator-selected dosage. This report examined effects on prespecified secondary end points, which included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS; assessed as adjusted mean difference in change from baseline; range, 0-100 with 100 indicating best health status; clinically important difference, ≥5 points) and Patient Health Questionnaire-2 (range, 0-6; score ≥3 supporting evaluation for depression) over 12 months.
resultsBaseline data were available for 2787 (97.5%) patients for KCCQ-CSS and 2624 (91.8%) patients for Patient Health Questionnaire-2. Median (interquartile range) baseline KCCQ-CSS was 42 (27-60) in the torsemide group and 40 (24-59) in the furosemide group. At 12 months, there was no significant difference between torsemide and furosemide in change from baseline in KCCQ-CSS (adjusted mean difference, 0.06 [95% CI, -2.26 to 2.37];
conclusionsAmong patients discharged after hospitalization for HF, a strategy of torsemide compared with furosemide did not improve symptoms or quality of life over 12 months. The effects of torsemide and furosemide on patient-reported outcomes were similar regardless of ejection fraction, previous loop diuretic use, and baseline health status. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT03296813.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.