Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37212502›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2023

Who, where, when: Colorectal cancer disparities by race and ethnicity, subsite, and stage.

Kristin M Primm, Andrea Joyce Malabay, Taylor Curry, Shine Chang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07215000 (Cleansing Options in Outpatient Setting to Improve Tolerance), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07215000 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Cleansing Options in Outpatient Setting to Improve Tolerance (COOP SIT) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMorehouse School of MedicineRan2025 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsColorectal Cancer Screening, Bowel Cleansing for ColonoscopyArmsGolytely, Sulfave, Sutab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin M PrimmDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6433-4195
Andrea Joyce MalabayDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Taylor CurryDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Shine ChangDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

CANCER PREVENTION EDUCAT--STUDENT RESEARCH EXPERIENCESR25CA056452 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Shine Chang · 1992 to 2026
$6.9M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA056452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are well-established disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes between White and Black patients; however, assessments of CRC disparities for other racial/ethnic groups are limited.

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database identified patients aged 50-74 years with CRC adenocarcinoma from 2000 to 2019. Trends in age-adjusted incidence rates were computed by stage at diagnosis and subsite across five broad race/ethnic groups (White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander [API], American Indian/Alaskan Native [AIAN], and Hispanic) and four API subgroups (East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian, and Pacific Islander) Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and diagnosis stage. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models assessed differences in cause-specific survival (CSS).

resultsHispanic, AIAN, Southeast Asian, Pacific Islander, and Black patients were 3% to 28% more likely than Whites to be diagnosed with distant stage CRC, whereas East Asian and South Asians had similar or lower risk of distant stage CRC. From Cox regression analysis, Black, AIAN, and Pacific Islanders also experienced worse CSS, while East Asian and South Asian patient groups experienced better CSS. No significant differences in CSS were observed among Hispanic, Southeast Asian, and White patients. When stratified by stage, Black patients had worse CSS across all stages (early, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.38; regional, HR = 1.22; distant, HR: 1.07, p < 0.05 for all).

conclusionDespite advances in CRC screening, treatment and early detection efforts, marked racial/ethnic disparities in incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival persist. Findings demonstrate the extent to which aggregating heterogenous populations masks significant variability in CRC outcomes within race/ethnic subgroups.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaColorectal NeoplasmsAgedAsianAsian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific IslanderBlack or African AmericanEthnicityHealth Status DisparitiesHispanic or LatinoHumansMiddle AgedRacial GroupsWhitecolorectal cancerracial/ethnic disparitiesSEERstage at diagnosissubsitetime trends

Identifiers

PMID37212502
PMCPMC10358189
OpenAlexW4377220846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.