ReviewNursing open2023
Interventions for family support in cardiometabolic disease: An integrative review.
Review in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary care providers' perspectives on the implementation of couple-based collaborative management for Chinese older adults with type 2 diabetes: a mixed-methods study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Connotation and Mechanism of Family Support for Patients with Chronic Diseases Under the Perspective of Health Promotion-A Scoping Review of Reviews.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Pathways linking benefit finding, fear of cancer recurrence, and family support to fertility concerns in women of reproductive age with malignant tumors: a cross-sectional study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Association of Emotion, Sleep Quality With Hypertension and Complications in the Elderly Population.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- A Qualitative Study on Barriers and Facilitators to Postpartum Cardiovascular Disease Risk Screening in Women with Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: Perspectives from Patients and Healthcare Providers.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Interventions for family support in cardiometabolic disease: An integrative review.Nursing open · 2023Review
- Examining the Associations of Family-Related Factors with Hypertension in Sexual Minority Women.LGBT healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo evaluate how family support affects cardiometabolic outcomes.
designIntegrative literature review. SOURCES: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus were searched for peer-reviewed primary research published between 2016 and 2021.
methodsIndependent screening of 1661 citations resulted in 17 international publications involving 16 experimental studies selected. Data were analysed using a constant comparison method.
resultsWhile the interventions varied regarding target, duration, setting and the profession of the interventionists, all studies demonstrated some level of the effectiveness for family involvement and support in the management of cardiometabolic diseases. The studies found improvement in health behaviours and clinical/psychosocial outcomes for the patients and the family members.
conclusionBased on the findings from this review, we recommend utilizing the following for future family interventions in the management of diabetes and/or hypertension: (1) broader definitions of family and structures; (2) a community participatory/action-research method with embedded healthcare workers; (3) an interdisciplinary approach with attention to goal-setting; (4) multimodal interventions including technology; (5) culturally tailoring interventions for relevance as needed; and (6) clear direction regarding support role and tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.