ArticleCancer medicine2023
Preoperative denosumab treatment in patients with giant cell bone tumors in limbs: A retrospective study using propensity score matching.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multicenter Study by the DENO Research Group on the Use of Denosumab in Giant-Cell Tumors of the Bone.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Preoperative denosumab combined with microwave ablation for joint preservation in advanced giant cell tumor of bone: a retrospective study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Combined preoperative denosumab and adjuvant microwave ablation for high-risk giant cell tumor of bone: a retrospective study in a single center.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Review
- Preoperative denosumab treatment in patients with giant cell bone tumors in limbs: A retrospective study using propensity score matching.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDenosumab is recommended for advanced giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) that is unresectable or resectable with unacceptable morbidity. But the effect of preoperative denosumab treatment on the local control GCTB remains controversial.
methodsWe conducted a study of 49 patients with GCTB in the limbs treated with denosumab before surgery and 125 patients without in our hospital from 2010 to 2017. Propensity-score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio between the denosumab and control groups was performed to minimize possible selection bias, and compared the recurrence rate, limb function, and surgical degradation between the two groups.
resultsThe 3-year recurrence rates in the denosumab group and the control group were 20.4% and 22.9% after PSM, respectively (p = 0.702). In the denosumab group, 75.5% (n = 37/49) of patients experienced surgical downgrading. Limb joint preservation rates were 92.1% (35) for 38 patients treated with denosumab and 60.2% (71) for 118 control subjects. (p ≺ 0.001). Postoperative MSTS were higher in patients in the denosumab group than in the control group (24.1 vs. 22.6, p = 0.034).
conclusionsPreoperative denosumab treatment did not result in an increased risk of local recurrence of GCTB. Patients with advanced GCTB may benefit from preoperative denosumab treatment for surgical downgrading and the preservation of the joint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.