ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2023
Exploring the latest advancements in physical therapy techniques for treating cervical spondylosis patients: A narrative review.
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of fascial manipulation on pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Three-dimensional Myofascial Release and Neck Strengthening in the Management of Cervical Spondylosis-A Case Report.International journal of therapeutic massage & bodywork · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence in Patients Previously Treated Conservatively for Cervical Spondylosis.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical applied anatomical study between the uncinate process of the cervical spine and the vertebral artery.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Fiber-type composition and 3D capillary analysis of the human splenius capitis muscle.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Article
- Histopathologic degenerative score as a predictor of minimal clinically important difference in pain and functionality following surgical treatment for disc herniation.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2025Observational
- Impact of cervical osteoarthritis on quality of life after free flap reconstruction in head and neck cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- 3D Printing for Personalized Solutions in Cervical Spondylosis.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical spondylosis is a widespread medical condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Treatment options include surgical and conservative approaches, with conservative treatment often being the preferred choice. Rehabilitation therapy is an essential component of conservative treatment, and advancements in technology have the way to the development of new physiotherapy techniques. The effectiveness of treatment largely hinges on the patient's ability to improve their dysfunction. This study aims to provide valuable insights into the use of new physical therapy techniques, such as Sling Exercises Training (SET), fascia manipulation, muscle energy technique (MET), and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF), that aid the rehabilitation of cervical spondylosis. By scrutinizing the current research status of these techniques, this study aims to present innovative ideas enhancing the rehabilitation process and outcomes for patients suffering from cervical spondylosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.