Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211948›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2023

Transcriptome profiling reveals the expression and regulation of genes associated with Fusarium wilt resistance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Vanika Garg, Annapurna Chitikineni, Mamta Sharma, Raju Ghosh, Srinivasan Samineni, Rajeev K Varshney, Himabindu Kudapa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vanika GargCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6446-4603
Annapurna ChitikineniCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.
Mamta SharmaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Raju GhoshInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Srinivasan SamineniInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Rajeev K VarshneyCentre for Crop and Food Innovation, WA State Agricultural Biotechnology Centre, Food Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4562-9131
Himabindu KudapaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INMurdoch University · AUInternational Center for Biosaline Agriculture · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium wilt (FW) is one of the most significant biotic stresses limiting chickpea production worldwide. To dissect the molecular mechanism of FW resistance in chickpea, comparative transcriptome analyses of contrasting resistance sources of chickpea genotypes under control and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc) inoculated conditions were performed. The high-throughput transcriptome sequencing generated about 1137 million sequencing reads from 24 samples representing two resistant genotypes, two susceptible genotypes, and two near-isogenic lines under control and stress conditions at two-time points (7th- and 12th-day post-inoculation). The analysis identified 5182 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between different combinations of chickpea genotypes. Functional annotation of these genes indicated their involvement in various biological processes such as defense response, cell wall biogenesis, secondary metabolism, and disease resistance. A significant number (382) of transcription factor encoding genes exhibited differential expression patterns under stress. Further, a considerable number of the identified DEGs (287) co-localized with previously reported quantitative trait locus for FW resistance. Several resistance/susceptibility-related genes, such as SERINE/THREONINE PROTEIN KINASE, DIRIGENT, and MLO exhibiting contrasting expression patterns in resistant and susceptible genotypes upon Foc inoculation, were identified. The results presented in the study provide valuable insights into the transcriptional dynamics associated with FW stress response in chickpea and provide candidate genes for the development of disease-resistant chickpea cultivars.

Indexed as

CicerFusariumDisease ResistanceGene Expression ProfilingTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37211948
PMCPMC12807412
OpenAlexW4377195773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.