ReviewScience progress
Lost in translation? - Caveat to the application of the voter model in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Review in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal organization of ant foraging from a complex systems perspective.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The voter model is a paradigmatic model of competition between alternative states within groups. Its properties have been intensively studied in statistical physics. Due to its generality, the model lends itself to various applications in ecology and evolutionary biology. I briefly review these opportunities, but call attention to a frequently occurring misinterpretation: it is often assumed that the agents in the model represent individual organisms. I argue that this assumption only holds under very specific conditions, and thus the meaning of the agents is often 'lost in translation' between physics and biology. Instead of an individual-based view, I propose that an alternative, site-based approach is more plausible. I suggest that the biological applicability of the model could further be broadened by considering the transitional states of the agents (sites) explicitly and letting the network evolve according to the agents' states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.