Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211718›Full record

ArticleNursing open2023

Patient engagement practice within perinatal eHealth: A scoping review.

Jennifer N Auxier, Miriam Bender, Henna-Riikka Hakojärvi, Anna M Axelin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer N AuxierDepartment of Nursing Science, The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9504-2518
Miriam BenderSue & Bill Gross School of Nursing, University of California Irvine, Irvine, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2457-1652
Henna-Riikka HakojärviDepartment of Nursing Science, The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9827-8921
Anna M AxelinDepartment of Nursing Science, The University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2743-3589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a gap in knowledge about how perinatal eHealth programs function to support autonomy for new and expectant parents from pursuing wellness goals.

objectivesTo examine patient engagement (access, personalization, commitment and therapeutic alliance) within the practice of perinatal eHealth.

designScoping review.

methodsFive databases were searched in January 2020 and updated in April 2022. Reports were vetted by three researchers and included if they documented maternity/neonatal programs and utilized World Health Organization (WHO) person-centred digital health intervention (DHI) categories. Data were charted using a deductive matrix containing WHO DHI categories and patient engagement attributes. A narrative synthesis was conducted utilizing qualitative content analysis. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 'extension for scoping reviews' guidelines were followed for reporting.

resultsTwelve eHealth modalities were found across 80 included articles. The analysis yielded two conceptual insights: (1) The nature of perinatal eHealth programs: (1) emergence of a complex structure of practice and (2) practising patient engagement within perinatal eHealth.

conclusionResults will be used to operationalize a model of patient engagement within perinatal eHealth.

Indexed as

TelemedicineTherapeutic AllianceData ManagementFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParentsPatient ParticipationPregnancyimplementationperinatal caretechnology

Identifiers

PMID37211718
PMCPMC10333891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.