Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37211661›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Spontaneous intracranial hypotension due to CSF-venous fistula: Evaluation of renal accumulation of contrast following decubitus myelography and maintained decubitus CT to improve fistula localization.

Richard I Farb, Sean T O'Reilly, Everardus J Hendriks, Philip W Peng, Eric M Massicotte, Yasmine Hoydonckx, Patrick J Nicholson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Optimizing density of intrathecal contrast at digital subtraction myelography: Evaluation of differing needle characteristics and injection rates in a phantom.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Richard I FarbDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7770-3762
Sean T O'ReillyDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Everardus J HendriksDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Philip W PengDepartment of Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eric M MassicotteDepartment of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yasmine HoydonckxDepartment of Anesthesiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick J NicholsonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Division of Neuroradiology, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7182-5112
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PurposePresented here is a strategy of sequential lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography (LDDSM) followed closely by lateral decubitus CT (LDCT) to facilitate cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-venous fistula (CVF) localization.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of patients referred to our institution for evaluation of CSF leak. Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 leaks, and those not displaying MR brain stigmata of intracranial hypotension were excluded. All patients underwent consecutive LDDSM and LDCT. If the CVF was not localized on the first LDDSM-LDCT pair the patient returned for contralateral examinations. Images were reviewed for CVF and for accumulation of contrast within the renal pelvises expressed as a renal pelvis contrast score (RPCS) in Hounsfield units (HU).ResultsTwenty-two patients were included in this study. In 21 of 22 patients (95%) a CVF was identified yielding an RPCS for the LDDSM-LDCT pair ipsilateral to the CVF ranging from 71 to 423 with an average of 146 HU. An RPCS of the negative side LDDSM-LDCT pair contralateral to a CVF was available in 8 patients and averaged 51 HU. In 4 patients the initial bilateral LDDSM-LDCT pairs did not reveal the location of the CVF however in 3 of these 4 cases the CVF was revealed on a third LDDSM repeated ipsilateral to the higher RPCS.ConclusionThe strategy of sequential LDDSM-LDCT coupled with evaluation of renal accumulation of contrast agent appears to improve the rate of CVF localization and warrants further evaluation.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid LeakIntracranial HypotensionMyelographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAngiography, Digital SubtractionContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaCerebrospinal fluid leakCSF–venous fistuladecubitus myelographydigital subtraction myelography

Identifiers

PMID37211661
PMCPMC12280252
OpenAlexW4377195596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.